Decanter Magazine - the route to all good wine

Latest issue
Subscribe
Renew online
Buy Decanter:
In the UK
In the US
Find your nearest
UK newsagent

Advertisements
News Alerts
Keep up to date with our FREE daily news alerts and monthly newsletters including decantertrade
Shopping Mall

Retailers
UK and Europe
Worldwide
Shopping
Property
Recruitment
Books
Accessories & Gifts
Storage & Refrigeration
Tourism

Learning Route
Free tasting kit
Links
Wine courses
Wine clubs
The basics
Wine terminology - grapes
How do they taste?
Glossary
Wine Investment
Features
2008 Harvest reports
Burgundy 2007
Bordeaux 2008
Book reviews
Am I a great vintage?
Bordeaux En Primeur
Other Features
Events reports
Events slideshows
Decanter contributors
RSS Feed

Latest News

Cork is the most sustainable form of closure, study finds

December 4, 2008
Sally Easton

A year-long life cycle analysis (LCA) of the environmental impact of cork, plastic and aluminium screwcap stoppers has found what is already widely accepted: that cork is the most environmentally-friendly stopper.

The was study undertaken by analysts PricewaterhouseCoopers, commissioned by Amorim, the world's largest cork manufacturer.

Related stories:
  • BBC cork documentary flawed
  • Bordeaux: we'll cut emissions by 75%
  • Screwcaps are best: Decanter verdict
  • The report found plastic stoppers, including the plastic capsule that goes over the top of the bottle, are nine times more damaging to the environment - and aluminium screwcaps are twenty-two times - than cork stoppers, including corks with a plastic capsule.

    The LCA included an evaluation of a plastic capsule designed for both cork and plastic stoppers to compare 'like with like' against screwcaps, which do not need a plastic capsule.

    The first independent survey comparing all three main types of wine bottle stopper, the study was conducted in accordance with
    ISO (International Standards Organisation) protocols which require peer
    review, and involved representatives from manufacturers of the other types of closures as well as a life cycle analysis expert.

    It calculated various environmental impacts: non-renewable energy consumption, water consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, atmospheric acidification, formation of photochemical oxidants which cause ozone layer depletion, the production of solid waste, and the eutrophication (loss of animal life) of surface water.

    Of the seven environmental impacts studied, cork performed best on six of them. But performance was only second-best on water consumption.

    Have your say...
    To post your comment on this story, email us at news@decanter.com, making sure the relevant headline is in the subject field

    Not a surprise to see confirmation of cork as the most sustainable closure, or to see that Amorim have funded the research. What a shame the industry would have to compromise the quality of wine so much in order to keep using it.
    Belinda Jackson, Wine Consultant, New Zealand

    OK, fine, let's make Ferraris and jets out of cork. Would be about as effective.
    John Kilbourne

    Being in the industry myself I can attest to the use of both closures and without a doubt the aluminium screwcap closure is far superior.

    If only one could ask the poor cork tree how it feels about being harvested that way while the aluminium screwcap is 100% recyclable.

    It is time for the media to realize that the cork producer's association uses their vast resources to send you this kinda dribble on a regular basis – imagine what it would've been like if there was a 'vinyl producer's association' when Compact Discs were being launched extolling the virtues of why one should stick to vinyl?

    Move on people, embrace technology, screw cap really works and the trees really enjoy being left alone!
    Dave Hutton, Sales and Marketing, Rustenberg, South Africa

    I would suggest that the carbon footprint of producing the 1-3% of TCH effected wine (or randomly oxidized) that needs to be poured down the sink, or the petrol required to take it back to the retailer for a replacement would offset the or most likely outweigh any savings.

    I would also suggest that the energy relativity of the closure vs. the glass requirements of the bottle would be nigh on insignificant. Therefore if this was an area we really needed as a priority over other options, we would consider real carbon reduction alternatives such as tetra-pack or similar (French Rabbit www.frenchrabbit.com ).

    The writing is on the wall for cork. Perhaps Amorim should consider diversifying into new technology rather than expending energy on questionable spin.

    Peter Nixon, Sydney Australia




    Register on decanter.com absolutely free for news alerts delivered direct to your email inbox, and our fortnightly newsletter with advance notice of what’s coming up in Decanter magazine, offers, competitions and more.

    PLUS registration is a one-stop shop for the Decanter magazine Archive and Decanter Fine Wine Tracker.

    Search for similar news stories

    Back to index

    Advertisements
    Shopping directory
    Poll
    Is Port the most undervalued fortified wine?
    To comment on this month's poll email editor@decanter.com

    Members Log in

    Username
    Password
    keep me signed in unless I sign out

    Register free Forgot password?

    Decanter worldwide

    Chinese
    Hungarian

    Sister sites

    House to Home
    Country Life
    Horse & Hound
    The Field
    Shooting UK
    Homes & Gardens
    Ideal Home
    Yachting and Boating World
    All IPC Media sites

    Contact Us

    Editorial...support...
    sales...marketing...
    Decanter media pack

    Contact us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Trusted Reviews
    © Copyright 2007 IPC Media Limited, All rights reserved