Michael Broadbent is suing the publishers of The Billionaire's Vinegar for defamation of character.
The Billionaire's Vinegar, by Benjamin Wallace, is an account of the 'Jefferson bottles affair', and its attendant court cases, which has captivated the wine world for years.
Broadbent, the veteran former director of Christie's, and the longstanding Decanter columnist, is suing for libel in the UK because the book is available here although it is published by Random House in the US.
At the heart of the case is a cache of more than a dozen 18th-century bottles apparently found in a walled-up basement in Paris in 1985 by German collector Hardy Rodenstock.
Some of these, including the now-notorious bottle of 1787 Lafite, were engraved Th:J. According to Rodenstock they were bought by Thomas Jefferson when he was ambassador to Paris.
Three of the bottles were sold at Christie's between 1985 and 1987: the 1787 Lafite, a 1784 Château d'Yquem, and a half-bottle of 1784 Château Margaux.
Malcolm Forbes, the late publisher, paid US$156,450 for the 1787 Lafite in the 1985 auction, a single-bottle auction record that remains unsurpassed.
Another billionaire businessman, William Koch, is suing Rodenstock, claiming that he was the source of four allegedly fake Jefferson bottles that Koch bought in 1988.
Broadbent is now suing Random House for defamation. Broadbent says Wallace accuses him of inventing a bid for the half-bottle of 1784 Margaux, to ensure that the final buyer paid over the odds.
He also says there are references in the book to him 'colluding' with Rodenstock, all of which he claims are quite false.
'The book is full of inaccuracies and libel,' he told decanter.com. 'This is very damaging, claiming I have lost my grip.'
Sarah Webb, Michael Broadbent's lawyer, said, 'the book contains serious defamatory allegations about my client, alleging fraud and dishonesty. We expect the matter to be in court next year.'
According the Daily Mail, Random House said it doesn't believe it has defamed Broadbent and will defend the lawsuit.
Have your say... To post your comment on this story, email us at news@decanter.com
Michael, are you not past taking notice of twittering ignorami.
Why spoil you later years with such trivial banter.
Those who believe it will be telling everyone more about themselves
than about you.
Dr Ken Gillman, Australia
When I read the book, I did not think it impugned on the integrity of Mr. Broadbent. It may have been slightly suggestive, but not outrageous. The individual I think who was shown to be a rat was Hardy Rodenstock. The other person who did not come out too well in the book was Robert Parker, who actually published reviews based upon his tasting of the Rodenstock stash. While I would suspect that there are not many equivalents to the Rodenstock bottles around, I think the whole world should be suspicious of any older bottles in the future. Kevin Beck, Broken Arrow, OK USA
Register on decanter.com absolutely free for news alerts delivered direct to your email inbox, and our fortnightly newsletter with advance notice of what’s coming up in Decanter magazine, offers, competitions and more.
PLUS registration is a one-stop shop for the Decanter magazine Archive and Decanter Fine Wine Tracker.
