Cru Bourgeois logo
Cru Bourgeois logo
(Image credit: Cru Bourgeois logo)

Steven Spurrier assesses the Official Selection of the Crus Bourgeois du Medoc, the first listing since the abandonment of the 2003 Classification

The Official Selection of the Crus Bourgeois du Medoc comprises 243 chateaux all of whose wines have been awarded the ‘Reconnaissance’ of quality under a system set up this year by the Alliance des Crus Bourgeois du Medoc with the help of the Bureau Veritas, whose primary occupation is ‘the evaluation of standards of compliance’.

The members of the 1855 Classification of the Medoc may well be more prestigious, but it is a club from which a chateau cannot be removed. Perhaps these chateaux do not need an extra guarantee of quality via a blind tasting against a benchmark, but the Crus Bourgeois have decided to do this and the average quality was evident from the tasting held in London of 80 of the 243 wines from the 2008 vintage.

It is very important to state that these wines represent a very specific style, for they are made from a Cabernet Sauvignon/Merlot blend with sometimes a little Cabernet Franc and/or Petit Verdot, grown on gravelly soils in a temperate maritime climate.

If the consumer is looking for a ‘Bordeaux Blend’, these are benchmarks. Moreover, there is a certain homogeneity in price, with perhaps 80% falling into the £10-£15 range, which I feel is good value for someone looking for single chateau quality.

The 2008 vintage showed well, with most of the wines being in the 2011-16 time span with a longer future for the best. While most were ‘classic’ Medocs, there is an increasing hint of ‘modernity’ that revokes the idea that Bordeaux is old-fashioned. My notes showed mostly ‘15 = good’ and ‘16 = good +’, with very few lower and several higher marks.

Here are my favourites in each appellation:

Medoc

Fleur la Mothe; La Branne; La Cardonne; L’Argenteyre; Les Grands Chenes; Les Ormes Sorbet; Preuillac; Rollan de By; Tour Haut-Caussan (excellent).

Haut-Medoc.

Cambon La Pelouse, Clement-Pichon; d’Agassac; de Gironville; Doyac; du Taillan; Paloumey; Peyrat-Fourthon.

Listrac.

Fonreaud; Lestage.

Moulis;

Dutruch Grand Poujeaux; Malmaison.

Margaux.

Deyrem-Valentin; Grand Tayac (excellent); La Tour de Bessan; Tayac.

Pauillac.

Fonbadet;

Saint-Estephe.

Clauzet; La Haye; l’Argilus du Roi; Le Crock, Serilhan, Tour des Termes.

There were no Saint-Juliens in the tasting.

To sum up: it is my view that the strict yet positive rules imposed by the Alliance will be very effective and will re-affirm the identity of the Crus Bourgeois in their own right, which will benefit producers and consumers alike.

Written by Steven Spurrier

Steven Spurrier
Decanter Magazine, Consultant Editor
Decanter’s consultant editor Steven Spurrier joined the wine trade in London in 1964 and later moved to Paris where he bought a wine shop in 1971, and then opened L’Academie du Vin, France’s first private wine school in 1973. Spurrier staged the historic 1976 blind tasting between wines from California and France, the Judgment of Paris, and in the 1980s he wrote several wine books and created the Christie’s Wine Course with then senior wine director Michael Broadbent, a veteran Decanter columnist. In 1988 Spurrier returned to the UK to focus on writing and consultancy, with his clients including Singapore Airlines. He has won several awards, including Le Personalité de l’Année (oenology) 1988 for services to French wine and the Maestro Award in honour of California wine legend André Tchelistcheff (2011) and is president of the Circle of Wine Writers as well as founding the Wine Society of India. He also produced his own wine, Bride Valley Brut, from his vines in Dorset.