{"api":{"host":"https:\/\/pinot.decanter.com","authorization":"Bearer ODEzMmUxMTg3MmY0MTY2YzY3YzMyZGJiNDM0MDgwNzkwMzQ3NDhjMTA4M2JkZWM1Yjg4MmNhNGI4MDU4NjJjYQ","version":"2.0"},"piano":{"sandbox":"false","aid":"6qv8OniKQO","rid":"RJXC8OC","offerId":"OFPHMJWYB8UK","offerTemplateId":"OFPHMJWYB8UK","wcTemplateId":"OTOW5EUWVZ4B"}}

Abolish WET tax, major Australian producers urge government

In a bid to reduce Australia's wine glut two of the country's major players are calling for the abolition of the WET tax.

Yarra Valley (Image: Wine Australia)

The Wine Equalisation Tax (WET) exacerbates the country’s oversupply problems, Premium Wine Brands and Treasury Wine Estates say.

WET is a value-based tax paid on both New Zealand and Australian wines consumed in Australia.

It entitles producers to an annual rebate of 29% up to a maximum of AUS$500,000 and is widely seen as beneficial to smaller producers.

In its submission to the government, Treasury estimates that AUS$900m is collected as WET each year, with more than $200m returned to producers as a rebate, of which $30m goes to New Zealand producers.

Both Pernod Ricard-owned Premium, and Treasury Wine Estates, claim WET distorts market forces, has enabled unsustainable players to survive, and hindered consolidation.

Premium Wine Brands CEO Jean-Christophe Coutures added ‘Industry efforts to restructure have not succeeded and there is an urgent need for intervention to remove impediments to the restructure process – we believe that this includes the current wine tax arrangements’.

Written by Rebecca Gibb

Latest Wine News