{"api":{"host":"https:\/\/pinot.decanter.com","authorization":"Bearer ZmYxYzA0Yzg0OGNiNjUzNGZlNmU2OGIyNDMzZjQ0Y2JkOWU5ZmM5NGZhZTI4MTk5NDg0MzU4ZDFkYzNkNTEzYQ","version":"2.0"},"piano":{"sandbox":"false","aid":"6qv8OniKQO","rid":"RJXC8OC","offerId":"OFPHMJWYB8UK","offerTemplateId":"OFPHMJWYB8UK","wcTemplateId":"OTOW5EUWVZ4B"}}

Duckhorn claims right to duck image and name

Premium California producer Duckhorn Vineyards is locked in a legal dispute over who holds the copyright on ducks.

The eminent Napa winery, whose top wines sell for up to $90 on release, claims ducks and duck designs are ‘associated in the minds of the consuming public with Duckhorn’, the New York Times says, quoting co-founder Dan Duckhorn.

Duckhorn produces a range of wines, all closely associated with, and illustrated by, the contentious bird: the Decoy, the cult Paraduxx, Goldeneye and King Eider.

But Duck Walk Vineyards (label pictured) of New York state is standing up to its powerful near-namesake – which has already seen off two threats to its trademark.

In 1999 Central Coast winery Cecchetti Sebastiani released a Smoking Duck brand – and was persuaded by Duckhorn co-founder Dan Duckhorn to change the name and replace the label.

And Oregon’s Duck Pond Cellars reached a confidential settlement with the California winery, Duckhorn legal officer Leslie Tschida told decanter.com.

According to the New York Times, Duck Walk filed a pre-emptive complaint in a district court, asking a judge to confirm its right to use ducks on its label. Duckhorn responded with a lawsuit claiming its adversary had violated trademark law.

The case – which has been simmering since August 2000 – is pending. Both parties have been forbidden to comment by the judge.

Written by Adam Lechmere

Latest Wine News