Napa: long, cool 2010 promises 'elegant' vintage
- Friday 3 December 2010
Joseph Phelps Spring Valley Ranch: '1991and 1985 were cooler than 2010: both were great'
Across the region volumes were low, there is good colour in the must, sugars are good but not excessive, and alcohol levels will be comparatively modest.
This should mean 'balanced, elegant wines', as Terry Hall of Napa Valley Vintners put it.
The 2010 season was exceptionally cool and long, with some wineries leaving parcels until November. It was a year of extremes for growers, with prolonged coolness, intense heat spikes in August, and monsoon-like rainfall in late October which interrupted a much-needed Indian Summer.
Some wineries pickec before the October storms but many lost a sizeable amount of fruit, either from heat spike damage or green harvest – dropping clusters to enhance ripening in the cool temperatures. There was also the issue of uneven ripeness.
Jan Krupp of Stagecoach Vineyards on Atlas Peak said, ‘wineries that performed conscientious fruit thinning and made well-timed harvest decisions will make very good wines from a difficult vintage.’
Chris Phelps of Swanson Vineyards said, ‘Long, cool seasons are the best for quality Napa red Bordeaux varieties.’
This is borne out by Elias Fernandez at Shafer, whose fruit comes mainly from Stag’s Leap district. He expects ‘another stellar year for Shafer. Grapes had extremely thick skins that contained more tannin and color than most years. Some of the Merlots taste like Cabernet.’
As for the whites, there is a good deal of optimism. Dirk Hampton, chairman and director of winemaking at Far Niente, said, ‘It's by far the one of the best vintages [for Chardonnay] in 30 years. There is clarity of fruit and balance of juice.’
Also optimistic are those veterans who recall cool vintages in the past. ‘Nineteen ninety-one and 1985 were cooler than 2010 and both vintages were great,’ Damian Parker at Joseph Phelps told Decanter.com.

Decanter World Wine Awards






Have your say!
Jay
December 09 15:51
2002 and 2003 produced big, tasty wine in Napa/Sonoma. 2005 was hyped heavily but only a few of that vintage that I've had this year lived up to it, the rest were unremarkable. My experience with CA's marketing verbiage is that "elegant and balanced" means "lacking flavor," or as Gary's link says, "lighter and brighter." Since I like heavier, sturdy wine I'll look for the ones that stayed on the vine the longest.
Ed
December 08 13:52
And the marketing spin begins...
During the year, all we read was about was the uncertainty about the coming harvest - unripe grapes as summer progressed and then burned grapes after the short heat wave at the end. At harvest no grower or wine maker could predict what the wine would be like.
And now that harvest is over, the wines will be "elegant"?
You crack me up. This reminds me of a comment I heard at Keenan Winery a few months ago. "Some years the wine is fruit-forward, and tasty. Other years the wine has better structure. But in no year is the wine bad."
In other words, only the marketing chnages year-to-year.
Gary Langlsey
December 06 18:45
Very excited to see how the vintage shapes up. By all accounts sounds like it will be unique! I ran across this on Twitter - it only covers Napa Valley but it has a good summary of growing conditions: http://twurl.nl/440ryj
Mark
December 06 11:24
Could be a good year even with low sugars!