Russia to stop using 'Soviet Champagne' name
- Friday 28 October 2011
Image: Ultimate Wine Shop
Meeting at the Abrau-Durso winery in the country’s Krasnodar region near the Black Sea coast, members of the Russian Winegrower and Winemaker Union agreed in principle to outlaw the ‘Sovetskoye Shampanskoye’ trademark, without fixing a timescale for the ban.
The name, which was established under Stalin in the 1920s, is still widely used by privately-owned producers today.
It is understood that there was strong opposition to the move from many producers, who fear that sales will plummet once the name is banned – but they voted in favour after strong encouragement from Abrau-Durso, the sparkling wine producer owned by Boris Titov.
Titov, a wealthy former petrochemicals trader, also owns Château d’Avize in Champagne, but denied that the proposed ban is related to his plans in France.
‘It’s not because we want to be good in Champagne,’ he said. ‘It will be better for us to be members of international society, to go out with our wine without any problems.’
The ban is also linked to Russia’s own plans for a system of regional appellations, which were also discussed at the weekend.
‘Everyone understands that if we want to introduce appellations in Russia, we have to respect others,’ said Titov.
The appellation proposals, which are still being discussed, are likely to focus on two main production areas: the Rostov-on-Don river valley and the Northern Caucasus, with sub-regions likely to include Anapa – which has already provoked the ire of producers in California's Napa Valley.

Decanter World Wine Awards








Have your say!
Ivan Alvarez
October 29 21:36
To Rona: In 1920 Crimea was part of Russia and was "annexed" to Ukraine only under Khruschev, many decades later.
There is a general agreement between CIVC and a bigger group of the so called "secondary sparkling wine factories" concentrated in Moscow to drop the name "Shampanskoye" from the labels after 2025. The Russian "wine law" (yet to be adopted by the Duma) has settled this date to 2015. So Mr. Titov is just putting a brave front and promoting himself on quite dubious grounds - without fixing a timescale for the ban, aha. On the other hand owning a chateau in Champagne that doesn't have a single vine in property but has the right to print labels opens quite wide "business possibilities" for the domestic market: you've got the wine, now you also get the (right / nice) labels.
RonaGyuri
October 28 13:20
Unfortunately I must inform you that the ????????? ?????????? was an Ukraine product!