Bordeaux 2011: Chateau Angludet first to release
- Wednesday 11 April 2012
Angludet is €16 a bottle ex-cellar, sold via negociants Maison Sichel.
Commentators have been quick to point out this may be 20% less than 2010, but it is still £20 more than the 2008 vintage, which some are using as benchmark for 2011, both in terms of price and quality.
The chateau has jumped in price in recent years, London merchant prices going from £150 on release in 2008 to £250 in 2010. The 2008 is currently selling for around £170 a case.
The 2011 from the Sichel-owned Margaux property has been praised by critics.
Steven Spurrier, whose reviews of the Medoc en primeur wines will be published on 16 April, said it is 'certainly worth £198'.
Simon Staples at Berry Brothers called it ‘damn fine’.
Other commentators have pointed out that the price of producing wine in Bordeaux made a reduction of more than 20% very difficult when a wine is below £300 a case in the first place.
Decanter's full Bordeaux 2011 ratings and vintage report will be published at 9am on Monday 16 April.
[image: uncorked.co.uk]

Decanter World Wine Awards






Have your say!
Michael Waldschuetz
May 02 14:16
Matthew, thank you for your long reply. But there is one terrible misunderstanding here: I do not think at all that speculators should benefit from the system. I do belong to those old fashioned people who buy Bordeaux to drink it because they love it. If I honestly told you here what I think of speculators decanter would probably refuse to publish it. So I completely go along with you. My first comment was more an attempt to analyze the consequences of a policy of high ex chateau prices for the en primeur system. And what you see now is more or less what I suggested: that almost nobody buys and the system comes to a halt. I do understand that chateaux don`t like speculators to make the profit. But if they come out with speculative prices themselves the customers won`t buy and everybody will lose.
Matthew
April 27 23:12
Michael, thank you, I read the blog.
It seems to me that it is entirely consistent with the enor of my earlier post and particularly my closing paragraph.
His thesis is essentaily that the system rewards (and should reward (1) chateaux, becuase they achieve greater distribution through negotiants, (2) negotiants because they make a margin on the sale to the final constomer, and (3) the "final customer, who is the most important person of all, [because] he or she has bought the wine at a good price en primeurs, far cheaper than it would be were they to try to buy the wine at a later date."
It is clear that when talking about customers, he is talking about people who purchase wine to drink it.
Notably absent is any reference to your thesis, that the system must benefit the speculator. In fact, that thesis is contrary to the whole spirit of the article, because the reward to the consumer, who actually drinks the wine, is that it is purchased early and so at a good price. The consumer purchasing on the secondary market from a speculator enjoys no such advantage.
In fact, the article even discourages (by implication) the practice of purchasing to fund drinking, buy holding half your allocation and selling it for a profit.
I think the en primeur system is great, if the price accomodates consumers (not speculators) who are prepared to display the necessary faith and confidnece it takes to hand over a large sum of money for a wine still in barrell (and so its final characteristics and quality by no means certian), well before receipt.
That is the third component of the system and a fundamental component to make the system work. If the only, or even the chief, argument for responsible release prices is so that speculators can make a profit, then there is no case for en primeur.
The sad reality is that pricing low to reward consumers means the prices are also low enough to encourage speculation. Unless a stop can be put to that, it seems to me that the en primeur system is doomed. Why on earth, I repeat, should chateaux price anything other than at the level the market will bear, if the result of doing otherwise is that people profit from their labour and employment of capital, simply by buying low and then immediatly selling high? As the article acknowledges, the obvious (and by no means wicked) response from chateaux will and should be to hold back thier production and then sell it at the price the market will bear.
Michael Waldschuetz
April 23 14:49
Matthew, if you want to understand the primeur system better and why everybody (the chateaux, negociants, distributors and last but not least the customers) should and - to make the system work - must profit read the article of Christian Seely in his Blog (christianseely.com). This man is the managing director of AXA and responsible for Pichon-Baron, Petit Village and Suduiraut and other Chateaux. To quote him: "For all this (the primeur system) to work, the prices en primeur have to be right." So don`t get mad about my comment, but read the blog and calm down! And let`s hope for reasonable prices!
Matthew
April 14 07:39
Michael, why should the producers "think of the rest of the market players" and allow them to profit of their wines?
Like anyone else, I am sorely disappointed by the way wine prices, and those of Bordeaux in particular, are going. But you can hardly blame the Chateaux for pricing at the point the market will bear. Why on earth would they price any lower, if the reason for doing so is to allow a speculator to profit from their hard work, simply to keep the "system in balance"?
En primeur serves a useful purpose: allowing producers to free up capital, by avoiding a long wait from harvest to release without sale. They can then invest in the next vintage. It is not a system designed to allow profit from speculation. In fact, its a damn shame that there is wine speculation at all.
If you'd rather purchase your wines on release, for the same price as en primeur, do so. But don't complain that you are no longer able to make a profit.
I would be much more sympathetic if your complaint was that, by pricing so high, and thereby and eliminating the "dynamic of growth", chateaux are not rewarding the good faith, trust and loyalty, consumers show when purchasing en primeur.