Decanter World Wine AwardsEU wine regions lobby against vineyard extension
- Monday 5 November 2012
EFOW: against any liberalisation of planting rights
The European Commission envisions a liberalisation of planting rights starting in January 2016.
A meeting on 7 November organised by the Association of European Wine Regions (AREV) will gather elected officials representing more than 50 European wine regions to say ‘no’ to the Commission reform plan, according to a press release.
Growers are now close to the required majority that would block the Commission’s reform. To date, 15 out of 27 EU countries – including France, Spain, Italy, Germany and Portugal – have registered their disagreement and formally asked the European Commission to reconsider.
To obtain a qualified majority, 255 votes in the European Parliament are also required in addition to a majority of EU countries, but the growers’ lobby is short by 40 votes.
‘We need to convince a large country like Poland to vote with us,’ said Daniela Ida Zandona of the European Federation of Origin Wines (EFOW), which is taking part in the meetings next week.
Groups representing vineyard growers say that the Commission reform will lead to ‘catastrophic results’ for the historical and cultural nature of Europe’s vineyards.
EFOW cited Alsace wines as an example. ‘This small 15,600 ha vineyard has 5,000 producers and employs 20,000 people. These hillside vines form a quintessential part of one of the world’s most beautiful wine landscapes. Around 7m people visit Alsace every year, 85% of whom come to explore the wine routes,’ it says.
The European Commission’s reform would encourage vine planting to shift ‘from the hillside to the plains’ and ‘reduce the number of wine growers to around 100 or so,’ it continued. Finally, according to EFOW, ‘the tourism industry will wither away, the environment will deteriorate, and biodiversity would suffer.’
Zandona stressed that next week’s gathering is an effort to raise awareness in the EU Parliament.
Another key meeting takes place on 14 December when the so-called High Level Group, established under Dacian Cioloș, European Commissioner for Agriculture and Rural Development, gathers in Brussels.
Made up of representatives from each of the 27 EU member states, two EU Parliament observers and representatives from growers’ associations and wine industry groups, this group will offer influential opinions on the future of the reform plan.
Have your say!
LALAU
November 09 17:41
@ Mr Butler.
Champagne is extending within its area, because they are still some possibilities; but curiously, there, the AOC growers don't object, because they initiated the extension. This is double-talk: don't let them do what we do.
A.R.Butler
November 07 08:53
Herve Lalau. If that is the case why are the Champagne growers expressing their concerns over vineyard expansion within the AOC?
Tomas Eriksson
November 06 22:55
It's funny how some commentators make the *abolishment* of quotas on plantations into a case of bureaucratic meddling. In this case the European Commission is actually advocating more market freedom and the vineyard owners want to keep a (socialist/bureaucratic) system where you're not allowed to plant new vineyards without purchasing planting rights, by reversing a decision already taken. At the same time a lot of the subsidies will be phased out, I suppose it could be this part of the equation that the opposition is really aimed at?
If it's more profitable to produce wine on the Alsace plains below the Vosges compared to e.g. wheat, I can see no point why this should be restricted by planting rights that would have to be bought from e.g. a grubbed-up Languedoc vineyard. I presume that would be a simple Vin de France since it is outside the AOP/AOC Alsace zone.
Salvador
November 06 17:13
... or maybe European wine industry is afraid of increased competition and reduced profits? We all know how much money European wine industry receives from CAP funds. Why not removing subsidies and have free market?